FactCheckRadar Fact-check archive

Published fact-check

Polish Poll Shows Doubts About Russian Attack

Mostly true

Claim checked

“Radek Sikorski nějak neuspívá! Nedávný průzkum, který provedla spol. IBRiS, ukázal, že většina Poláků (58,2%) i přes totální mediální kampaň nevěří v ruskou hrozbu! V to, že Rusko napadne Polsko, určitě věří jen 3,8%!”

Published

Verdict

Mostly true

The checked claim is mostly true: a recent IBRiS poll really did find that 58.2% of Poles do not fear a Russian attack on Poland in the coming years, and only 3.8% are firmly convinced such an attack will happen. However, the post overstates the case by describing the result as disbelief in the "Russian threat" generally, by alleging an unproven "total media campaign," and by omitting that 24.5% of respondents do see an attack as possible.

Reasoning

A Czech-language post on X claimed that a recent survey by the Polish firm IBRiS showed most Poles — 58.2% — do not believe in a Russian threat, and that only 3.8% firmly believe Russia will attack Poland, despite what the author called a "total media campaign." The numbers themselves check out. The survey was conducted by United Surveys by IBRiS for Wirtualna Polska and asked respondents: "Are you afraid that in the next few years Russia will attack Poland militarily?" Dorzeczy and TV Republika both reported the identical figures on October 2, 2026: 58.2% said they do not fear Russian aggression (39.1% "rather not," 19.1% "definitely not"), while 3.8% answered "definitely yes" and 20.7% "rather yes" — together 24.5% who see an attack as at least somewhat possible. Another 17.4% had no firm opinion.

So the core percentages in the post are accurate. But the framing adds layers the poll does not support. The question measured fear of a specific military attack in the coming years, not belief in the "Russian threat" as a broad concept — a distinction that matters, because hybrid threats, sabotage, and disinformation are part of the security discussion in Poland and are not covered by this single question. The post's phrase "despite a total media campaign" is editorial commentary; nothing in the polling coverage documents such a campaign, and the survey results say nothing about its existence or effectiveness.

The post also leaves out key context from the same data. Nearly one in four respondents (24.5%) do consider a Russian attack possible, and the share fearing an attack was markedly higher among voters of the ruling coalition (41%), women (25% in a related IBRiS poll for Rzeczpospolita), and people aged 50–59 (32%). That same Rzeczpospolita-commissioned IBRiS survey, reported by Forsal on October 3, used a different question — whether the war in Ukraine could spill into Poland — and found 77.1% answering "no," which is consistent with a general mood of skepticism but is a separate measurement.

In short, the post's headline figures are faithfully drawn from a real, recent IBRiS poll, and its main empirical point — that most Poles do not fear an imminent Russian invasion — is supported. The verdict is mostly true because the post generalizes a narrow question about fear of attack into disbelief in the "Russian threat," injects an unsupported claim about a coordinated media campaign, and omits the roughly quarter of respondents who do see an attack as possible.

Key checks

  • The post claimed that 58.2% of Poles do not believe in a Russian threat, per IBRiS; the actual poll question asked whether respondents fear a Russian military attack in the next few years, and 58.2% answered that they do not — so the figure is correct but the question was narrower than 'the Russian threat' in general.

  • The post said only 3.8% definitely believe Russia will attack Poland; the poll found exactly 3.8% answering 'definitely yes,' though the post omitted that a combined 24.5% consider an attack at least somewhat possible.

  • The post attributed the results to resistance against a 'total media campaign'; no evidence in the polling coverage documents such a campaign, making that framing unsupported editorial commentary.

Confidence

High

Was this useful?

Your vote helps us see which fact-checks deserve more attention.

5 reviewed sources behind this verdict.

Might interest you next