FactCheckRadar Fact-check archive

Published fact-check

High-fiber diet linked to better melanoma outcomes

Supported

Claim checked

“The role of food is another area of intense focus. A seminal 2021 paper by researchers at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center showed that patients eating a high-fiber diet responded better to treatment for melanoma: For every 5-gram increase in fiber intake, the risk of cancer progression or death fell 30%.”

Published

Verdict

Supported

The claim that a 2021 MD Anderson study found a 30% reduction in melanoma progression risk for every 5-gram increase in fiber intake is supported. The original study, published in Science, and summaries from the National Cancer Institute and NIH all confirm this specific finding.

Reasoning

The CNN article references a "seminal 2021 paper" from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. This paper, published in the journal Science in December 2021, is well-documented in the provided sources. Both MD Anderson's own newsroom and the National Cancer Institute confirm the study's key finding: among melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy, "every 5-gram increase in daily fiber intake corresponded to a 30% lower risk of progression of the disease." The NIH summary also corroborates this exact statistic. The claim accurately reflects the results of the published research.

The claim is directly and repeatedly confirmed by the primary source (MD Anderson's news release) and two authoritative secondary sources (NCI and NIH). The evidence is unambiguous and leaves no room for doubt.

Key checks

  • 30% risk reduction per 5g fiber: The claim that every 5-gram increase in daily fiber intake was associated with a 30% lower risk of cancer progression or death is explicitly stated in the MD Anderson, NCI, and NIH sources.

  • 2021 MD Anderson study: The study was published in Science in December 2021 and was a collaboration between MD Anderson and the National Cancer Institute.

Confidence

High

Was this useful?

Your vote helps us see which fact-checks deserve more attention.

4 reviewed sources behind this verdict.

Might interest you next